Built around the work
The design starts with the task, materials, decisions, and review process.
Custom Builds
Some work is too specific for an off-the-shelf assistant. HIA builds tools around the documents, decisions, review steps, and handoffs your team already manages.
The tool, platform, and level of automation follow from the task, the context people need, and the decisions they must still own.
The design starts with the task, materials, decisions, and review process.
The tool uses the policies, examples, source material, and standards needed for usable work.
Important decisions, approvals, exceptions, and final responsibility remain with the people who own the work.
A tool earns its place when the team can understand it, test it, and use it inside the existing workflow.
Representative build types
These examples show the kinds of work HIA can support. The final design depends on your materials, systems, access requirements, review process, and the decisions the tool must help people make.
Research opportunities, qualify pursuits, organize source material, prepare proposal sections, check requirements, and review work before submission.
View example builds →Carry approved strategy and voice into briefs, campaigns, decks, executive materials, and public communications without rebuilding context each time.
View example builds →Support manager preparation, onboarding, policy navigation, employee guidance, feedback, and training while preserving review and escalation.
View example builds →Preserve context across meetings and decisions, prepare leadership materials, track commitments, and keep follow-through from disappearing into scattered notes.
View example builds →Compare claims with source material, find missing information, flag risks, apply review standards, and catch weak work before senior or client review.
View example builds →Monitor sources, synthesize evidence, compare options, test assumptions, and turn a large body of material into a decision someone can review.
View example builds →A custom tool earns its place when people repeatedly rebuild context, search the same material, enforce the same standards, or repair the same failures.
The same instructions, examples, documents, or background must be assembled for every task.
A few people carry the standards, catch mistakes, or translate the work for everyone else.
Drafts move through the same handoffs, rewrites, reconciliation, or approval loops.
The tool must follow source limits, permissions, review rules, or an existing approval process.
How the work moves
HIA keeps the build tied to real work throughout the process. That makes it easier to see what the tool should do, where it can fail, and what people must still review or decide.
We examine the task, materials, users, systems, decisions, handoffs, and failure points that shape the work.
We decide what the tool should retrieve, draft, compare, flag, or organize, and what remains under human review.
We use representative examples, edge cases, weak inputs, and review criteria to find where the tool breaks or misleads.
We prepare the tool, guidance, training, and refinement needed for the team to use it inside the existing workflow.
Common questions
Yes. HIA can begin with an assessment of the tools already in use, recurring work, leadership needs, information risks, and policy gaps. From there, we can recommend advisory, platform selection, implementation, training, a custom build, or no build.
Yes. HIA builds custom GPTs, Gemini Gems, Claude Projects, shared AI workspaces, agents, Apps Script tools, and structured workflows. The platform and format depend on the work, source material, user access, and level of control required.
Yes. HIA reviews the scope, instructions, source handling, testing, user guidance, and output. We trace where the tool drifts, what people misunderstand, and which steps create extra work, then repair, simplify, or rebuild it.
Yes. HIA compares platforms against the work, existing systems, information sensitivity, access needs, administrative controls, connected tools, setup requirements, and total cost.
Custom tools and agents start at $5,000. Broader organizational engagements start at $12,500. Scope depends on the work involved, source material, platform requirements, testing, integrations, training, and support after launch.
Some clients arrive with a specific workflow. Others know AI use is uneven, a platform decision is coming, or important work is taking too long. No use case, technical brief, or preferred platform is required.
Have a workflow, platform, training, or AI adoption question? Start with what you are trying to improve.
Contact HIA →